Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 3 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 5 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 7 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 9 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
| 10 | LIN James G. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 13 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 15 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% |
| 16 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | WU Dawei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | 12% |
| 18 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 19 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% |
| 20 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 22 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 23 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
| 24 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
| 26 | LI Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 95% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 30 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 15% | 1% |
| 32 | DREW Nicolas | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | PO Oliver | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 38 | WANG Michael | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 39 | COZINE Owen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 40 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% |
| 41 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | WU Michael | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 45 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | PETERSON Dale | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 50 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | AMRANI David | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | TSAI William | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.