March NAC

Y-12 Men's Épée

Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 DAVOODIAN Christopher V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 DODIN David V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
3 ELHUSSEINI Dylan V D V D V V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
3 MODANLOU Navid V V V V D V V V V V D 1.6 4 +2.4
5 ELHUSSEINI Kyle V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
6 LEE inwoo V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
7 ZHENG Andy V V D V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
8 ALI Farhan V V V D V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
9 MITEV Alexander V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
10 MAO Benjamin V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
11 BRADSHAW Carter V V D V V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
12 LAM Alan V V V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
13 DONAHUE Lake V V V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
14 GINZBURG Adam V D V V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
15 TRULL A.J. D V V D V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
16 SINGH Ravin D D D V V V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
17 KIM Jayden V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 BUI Henry V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
19 LAI Boden D V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 FRANGER Max V V V V V D V V D 2.0 5 +3.0
21 KANG EUNWOO D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
22 SOKOL Luke V V V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
23 LEE Aiden V V D V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
24 ERLIKHMAN Adrian D V V D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
25 SIMMES Jackson D V V V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
26 XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） V D V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
27 ZIEGLER John D V V V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
28 JIANG Matthew V D D V V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
29 OSBORN Hunter D V D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
30 LEE DoWon D V V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
31 ZENG Andrew D V D V V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
32 LOISEAU Oscar V D D D V D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
33 KOPPENHEFFER Rowan V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
34 CHOI Zachary V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
35 WANG Joey V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 CHEN Zhengyang V V V D V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
37 GRAVES Lawson V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
38 PARK Sangwook V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
39 BORISENKO Samuel V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
40 CHUTKAY Sai Pratham V V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
41 CHEN Bowen V V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
42 JAIN Samyak V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
43 LI zerong V V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
44 SAUNIER Cameron V V D V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
45 SWENSON Diego D V V D V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
46 GUO Lucas V D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
47 LIOZNYANSKY Miron V D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
48 SINGLETON Aman V V V D D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
49 DOUBOV Andrew D V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
50 CHAWLA Aarav V D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
50 SAVORETTI Pietro D D V V V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
52 CARTY JR Johndale V D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
53 ROLAND Mackinley D V V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
54 AYOTTE James D D V V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
55 VYSOTSKIY Evan V D V D D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
56 HUANG Yidong Allen D V D V D V V D 3.0 3 -
57 NAKAS Levent D D D V V V D 4.1 2 -2.1
58 GONZALEZ Aaron M V D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
59 DODIN Daniel M. D D V D V D V D 4.6 2 -2.6
60 DURKIN Hudson D V D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
61 KIM Teddy D D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
62 OLSON Joseph V D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
63 MEHROTRA Neel D D V D D V D 3.6 1 -2.6
64 BO Genero V D D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
65 KONG Brandon V V D V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
66 LIU Yueri V V D V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
67 HUANG Kenneth V D V V V D D 4.1 4 -0.1
68 MIDYANY Evan V V V D V D D 3.3 4 +0.7
69 PARK Aiden V D V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
70 ZHOU Shawn V V D V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
71 KUPPUSAMY Kotravel D D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
72 AHN EZRA V V V D D D D 2.0 3 +1.0
73 YU Jason D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
74 HERNDON Liam V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
75 SIEDOW William D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
76 SOLARZ Arthur V V D D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
77 KIM Julian D D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
78 GOROZA Eric D V V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
79 YILMAZ Tarik V D D D V D D 3.6 2 -1.6
80 KUGLER Luke D D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
81 SHCHUR Grayson V V D D D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
82 YAO Tristan D D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
83 HEADRICK Jack D D D V V D D 3.4 2 -1.4
84 NOVOJILOV Daniel D V V D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
85 DODDAPANENI Aarav D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
86 BAKKEN Archer D D D D V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
87 ARMSTRONG TyLee D V D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
88 SHAFFER Tyler V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
88 WU Nathan D V D V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
90 MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
91 LIU Adam D V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
92 ELMARSAFI Nurideen D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
93 ROBERTS Arthur D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
94 KIM Henry D D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
94 NOOL Alexander D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
96 BENNETT Pierce D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
97 ROSIELLO Francesco D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 TUMULA Arihaan D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
99 MOORE Alexander D D D D D V D 3.3 1 -2.3
100 FALKIEWICZ Alec R. D D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
101 KROPP Wesley V D D D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
101 HOOD Emery D D D V D D D 1.0 1 -
101 DAI Chengwen D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
104 YANG Gary D D D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
105 JAHAN-PARVAR Kourosh D D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
106 TWEMLOW Sacha D D D D D D 2.9 0 -2.9
107 CAFASSO Alexander D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
108 WANG Marcus D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
109 ROSADO Balthazar Francisco D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
110 CLARK Ian D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
111 DOAN Christopher D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
112 MAZAHERI Fletcher D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
113 WATTANAKIT Tawin D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
113 KIM Remington D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
115 HANNA Alexander D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.