Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | |
2 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
3 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
3 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
5 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
6 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
7 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
8 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
9 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
10 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
11 | WEI Qiancheng (Matt) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
13 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
14 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
15 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
16 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 9% | |
17 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
18 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
19 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
20 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
21 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
22 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
23 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
24 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
25 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
26 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
27 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
28 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% | |
29 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
30 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
31 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
32 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
34 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
35 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
36 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | 4% |
37 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
38 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 44% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | LI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | 3% | |
40 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
41 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
42 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
43 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
44 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
45 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
46 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
47 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% | |
48 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 32% | 5% | |
49 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
50 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
51 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 19% |
52 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
53 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
54 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
55 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
56 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
57 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
58 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
59 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
60 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
61 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
62 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
63 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | XIE Buster | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
65 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
66 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
67 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
68 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
69 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
70 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - |
70 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
72 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 10% | |
73 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
74 | WANG Rory | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
75 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
76 | WANG Brian | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
78 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 36% | 6% | |
79 | PARK Rion | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | |
80 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 98% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
80 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | |
82 | GERRISH William | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
83 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
84 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
85 | WU Alistair | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
86 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
87 | LI Toby | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - |
88 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
89 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
90 | ROZALSKI Eli | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
91 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
92 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
93 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
94 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
94 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
96 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
97 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | |
98 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
99 | WILLEY Emerson | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - | |
100 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
101 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 78% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
102 | KIM Brian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
103 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
104 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
105 | XU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
106 | MODADUGU Aryan | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
107 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
108 | KUANG Aaron | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
109 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 87% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
109 | PARK William | 100% | 87% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
111 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
112 | SAH Steven | 100% | 97% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
113 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
114 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | 100% | 73% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
115 | BAI Brian | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
116 | XU Ethan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
117 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | |
118 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
119 | REID Wesley | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |
120 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
120 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 61% | 9% | - | - | - | |
122 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
122 | CROOM Tucker | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
122 | FLATEN Gunnar | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
125 | SUN Neo | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
126 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
127 | SMITH Henry | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
128 | WEISS Quintin | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.