Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | LI Eric | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 5 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 6 | LIN James G. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 7 | ACHILOV Sayid | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 8 | OUYANG Matt J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 6% |
| 9 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 10 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | LIU Derek | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | NICOLL William | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 14 | GUO Sean | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | LI Owen | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 16 | PROMRAT Pete | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 19 | AHN Jun | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 20 | LI Aaron | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | SVERDLOV Seth | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LI Ayren | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
| 24 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | GAO Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 26 | SONG Bryan | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LI Jinghua E. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | XIANG Derrick | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KNIZHNIK David | 2% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LOGAN Kai | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NICOLL James | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BASOK Nikita | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 18% | 45% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | TORRES Treston | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 41 | UHRMACHER Idris | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | XU Ethan | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 43 | MUNDY Ezra | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 44 | GUO Justin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | LU Jason | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHU Brandan | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | LIU Ryan | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Julang | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | GAO Payton | 11% | 48% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | BADLANI Dev | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CHENG Ethan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SHIN Jiho | 8% | 41% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | PLASTARAS Trey | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.