Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 2 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 3 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 49% |
| 3 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 5 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
| 6 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | OUYANG Matt J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 9 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 10 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 5% |
| 12 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 14 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 5% |
| 15 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 16 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
| 19 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 20 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 21 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LI Ayren | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 3% |
| 24 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | GAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
| 26 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LOGAN Kai | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NICOLL James | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 41 | UHRMACHER Idris | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 43 | MUNDY Ezra | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 44 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 45 | LU Jason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHU Brandan | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Julang | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | GAO Payton | 100% | 89% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SHIN Jiho | 100% | 92% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.