Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V V D D D | V V V V V V | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
2 | PO Oliver | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
3 | LIN James G. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | LEWIS Akhil | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | CHENG Jonathan | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
7 | LIN Michael | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | KEE Andrew L. | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
9 | SIMA Congyu Josh | V D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
10 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
11 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
12 | JUDD Mehta J. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | KNIZHNIK David | V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
14 | LEE Eugene | D V V V D | V V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
15 | YAO Bradley | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
16 | TAN Christien | V D V V D D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
17 | SONG Bryan | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
18 | JOSEPH Willem | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | ZHEREBTCOV Kirill | V V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
20 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | V V V D V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
21 | JAUME Andrei | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
22 | LANG Dong Lin | V V V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
23 | HOWARD Michael | D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
24 | LIGOS Alex M. | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
25 | SONG Noel | D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
26 | PAN Henry | V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
27 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
28 | TANG August L. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
29 | TSAO Lukas | D V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
30 | YAP Nathan | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
31 | HUANG Eythan | V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | TRUBETSKI David | D V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
34 | GORDON Jacob | D V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
35 | TORRES Treston | V V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
36 | GONZALEZ II John L. | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
37 | POPE Alexander | D D V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
38 | PETERSON Dale | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
39 | MAO Lucas | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
40 | LEE Jonah | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
41 | DUSZA Zachery | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
42 | GRIEB Oliver | D D V V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
43 | CONVERSE Warren D. | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
44 | WERWA Griffith | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
45 | STURGIS Zachary C. | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
46 | GREENLEAF Paul | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
47 | WANG Rory | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
48 | TANG xianchi | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
49 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
50 | TALLARICO Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
51 | KHER Roan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
51 | RIFFATERRE Jason | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
53 | VILLANUEVA Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.