Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
| 2 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 3 | PLOTNICHENKO Vsevolod | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 5 | FERREIRA Noah J. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% |
| 6 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 8 | HA Daniel | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | EKE Frank | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 10 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 11 | MATEI Daniel | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | - |
| 12 | JIN Owen | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 13 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% | |
| 14 | WEI Michael | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 15 | WU Joseph | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 17 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 18 | SKAALAND Will | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | < 1% | - | - |
| 20 | DIBENERDINI Aidan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 21 | SIMPSON Patrick | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | DESTEFANO Julius | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | STEWART Charlie | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | HANSEN William | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 26 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | PARK Frederick | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | PRIHODKO Max | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHANG Braydon | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | - |
| 32 | CHOI Mason | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HUANG Adrian | 4% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | GRAYSON Joshua | 5% | 41% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | GAVIN Liam | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | GONG Haixiang | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WALCH Logan | 8% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | SHAO Haian | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | WU Jonathan | 26% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | WRIGLEY Matthew | 10% | 48% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.