Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | NORTH Alexander M. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | DUAN eric | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | JORDAN Anton | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | SINGH Aryaman | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 9 | WANG Clayton | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | LIN Harrison | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 12 | YANG Boyan | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 13 | CAO Brad | V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | HEADRICK Lance | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | CAO Albert | V D D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | LEE JoonWon | V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 18 | DAN Rex | D V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | AMOLSCH Dylan | D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | MEGGERS Davin | D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | BERNARD Jack B. | V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） | V D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 24 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 24 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | BUI Henry | V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | ALI Farhan | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | MODANLOU Navid | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | FISHMAN Rahm | V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | KANG EUNWOO | D V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | SINGH Ravin | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | CHENH Justin | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | SAUNIER Cameron | D V D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 34 | CHUNG Andrew | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 35 | HULL Liam | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 36 | CHEMEZOV Trent | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 37 | PETROW Zoryan | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | LEE Aiden | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 39 | KIM Joshua | D D D V D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 40 | STEPHENS Corbin | D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 40 | CARNALL Hunter | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 42 | KE Sebastian | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | FORAIDA Khalid | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | SERMONS Asa | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 45 | BOUDREAUX James | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 46 | WATERS Nathaniel | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 47 | TIKHONOV Daniel | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 48 | MORALES Diego | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 49 | WANG Aiden | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 50 | CARO Seph | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.