San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 76% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 3 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 3 | WYMAN Julian | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 5 | WOO Christian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 6 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 7 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 8 | SIU Aiden | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 10 | ZHENG zhe | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 11 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 12 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 46% | |
| 13 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 14 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 15 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 17 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 18 | RANJITH Yash M. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 19 | WANG Ethan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 21 | CHOI Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 22 | WECHSLER Jacob | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 23 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 24 | BAO Aaron | - | - | 2% | 17% | 51% | 29% | |
| 25 | OH Jaden | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Jett | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WONG Antonio | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PARK Gabriel | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | MA Andrew | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 34 | SHEN Owen | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 35 | LEE Dylan | 2% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 9% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 1% |
| 38 | KIM Andrew J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 3% |
| 39 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 40 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 41 | LAM Nicolas | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 42 | TUAN Evan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | PONCIN Sebastian A. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KIM Aiden | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | MA Bryant | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 46 | SONG Jeremy | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 47 | SISINNI Riccardo | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUBATKA JARRY Q. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 50 | LO Preston | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | LEVY Jacob | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | FANG Jaden | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Matthew H. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | ZENG Chuyi | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHENG Jonathan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | CHEN Justin K. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LIU William | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 58 | FUKUDA Diego | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 59 | NG Micah | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 60 | LOFTUS Luca | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | ZHU Raymond | 5% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | ZHANG Luke | 31% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | TSAY Jordan R. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 65 | LLIDO Soren | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | GORDON William L. | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | GAO Zachary | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 68 | LIU Aaron | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 69 | MAK Osman K. | - | 3% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 70 | LI Samuel | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | LOWE Austin | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | AGRAWAL Niki | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | KIM Harrison | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 74 | RAJ Jay | 2% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | MORROW Brenden | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 76 | TULYAG Azim | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 76 | LIU Yuxuan | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 78 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | WONG Esmond | 51% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 80 | CO Dylan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 81 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 22% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 82 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MIN Lucas | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | CHAN Connor | 29% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | PETERSON Matthew | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | RAY Oliver | 57% | 40% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.