San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
| 3 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 5 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 6 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 7 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 8 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 10 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 11 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 12 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% | |
| 13 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 14 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 15 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 17 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 13% |
| 18 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 19 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 11% |
| 21 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 23 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% | |
| 24 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 29% | |
| 25 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Jett | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 34 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 35 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 37 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 1% |
| 38 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 39 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 40 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 41 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 42 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | PONCIN Sebastian A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 46 | SONG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 47 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUBATKA JARRY Q. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 49 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 50 | LO Preston | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 54 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LIU William | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 59 | NG Micah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 60 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 61 | ZHU Raymond | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 69% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 65 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 68 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 69 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 70 | LI Samuel | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | LOWE Austin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 72 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 74 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 75 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 76 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 76 | LIU Yuxuan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 78 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 79 | WONG Esmond | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 80 | CO Dylan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 81 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 82 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 71% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | PETERSON Matthew | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 86 | RAY Oliver | 100% | 43% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.