Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RACHTCHININE Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
| 2 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 3 | TRAN Dai Long | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 5 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 6 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 7 | SNYDER IV William B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 8 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 9 | SCHWARTZ Elliott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 10 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 12 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 13 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 14 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 15 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN Wesley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | ADLER Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 19 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 20 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 21 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | COMBS Colson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 23 | SKEATE Jonathan F. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 25 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 26 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | KING Cameron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 29 | WU Byron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 30 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 69% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | DIETRICH Sam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 8% | - |
| 34 | KELLISH Jeffery L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 8% |
| 35 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 37 | HALL Timothy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 40 | PARK Prestan S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 41 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 42 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 43 | HERMAN Nathan | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 45 | SNYDER John W. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | WRIGHT Max | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 49 | TATE Leon J. | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | LU Qi | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | SCHULZE Ethan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CAMMETT William J. | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ROSENBERGER III Paul | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MOORE Guy L. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | HERNANDEZ Agustin | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | SMITH Steven | 100% | 88% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | SAUNDERS Eric | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | FLORES Jonathan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.