AFM Sunnyvale - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 2 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 3 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 20% |
| 5 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 6 | WATT Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 7 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 8 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | |
| 9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 10 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% | |
| 11 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 12 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | |
| 13 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 14 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 15 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 30% |
| 16 | BOYCE Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 17 | ULINICH Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 18 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | COHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 12% |
| 19 | NICHOLSON Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
| 21 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 22 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 23 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 24 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |
| 25 | PERKA Mike | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 26 | RUBIN Maxim | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | SCHINDLER Sergey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 29 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 93% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 34 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 35 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
| 37 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | KENNY Oliver | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 39 | MENDOZA Zoie | 100% | 94% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | LIU Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 41 | MORETTI David | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 43 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | CAMAMA Tessa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | MITTMAN Lela | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LIU Noah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Lauren | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHENG Zijun | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | HELGE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 52 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 53 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MITCHEM Paolo | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | LOMIO Nicholas | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 94% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 64 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | SMITH Marissa | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LIU Nathan | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 68 | FERRER Alison | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | BOHRMAN Daniel | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | LUO Zhe | 100% | 87% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
| 74 | KELMAN Nora | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BARTLETT Ryan | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.