DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | |
| 2 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 3 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 5 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 6 | SHREM Samuel G. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | |
| 7 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
| 8 | KING Cameron | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 10 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
| 11 | CHEN Brian | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | LI Benjamin | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | KWOUN Miles S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | CAO Albert | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | MEGGERS Davin | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | CHEN Eric | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 17 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 18 | UPSHAW Micah | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 19 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
| 20 | ABBOUD Michael | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 22 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 23 | LIN Harrison | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 24 | CAO Brad | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 25 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 26 | HANSEN Lars | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 27 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LEE Aiden | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DUAN Eric | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 32 | WU Shaochi | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 34 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHRISTY Peter C. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 38 | DAN Rex | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | CHEN Leonardo | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | SO Lorenzo | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | DAN Chuntao | 2% | 33% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | GAO Zachary | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | MILLER Kurt | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | MEGGERS Samuel | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | HU Robert J. | 13% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | KIM Joshua | 4% | 49% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SINFUEGO Adrian | - | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | BANNEN Nicholas | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | SIEDOW William | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | YU Jason | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | BLACK Ethan | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | PETRUNKO Kyrylo | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | LACHER Daniel | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | HOLLING Emma | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | TYLER-HALL Samuel | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.