DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
2 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
3 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
5 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
6 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% | |
7 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% | |
8 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
10 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
11 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
12 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
13 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
14 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
17 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
18 | UPSHAW Micah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
19 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
20 | ABBOUD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
21 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
22 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
23 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
25 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
26 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
27 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
28 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
29 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
31 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
32 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
33 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
34 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
35 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
38 | DAN Rex | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
39 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | DAN Chuntao | 100% | 98% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
43 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
44 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 96% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
48 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
49 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
50 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - | |
51 | YU Jason | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - | |
52 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
53 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
54 | PETRUNKO Kyrylo | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
55 | LACHER Daniel | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - | |
56 | HOLLING Emma | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
57 | TYLER-HALL Samuel | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
58 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.