Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
2 | SANDERS Ian W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
3 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
3 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
5 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
5 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
7 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
8 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
9 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
10 | JONES Tristan Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
10 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% |
12 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
13 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
14 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
15 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 23% |
16 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
17 | JONES Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
18 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
19 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
20 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% | 1% | |
21 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 2% |
22 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 4% |
23 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - |
24 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 4% |
25 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - |
26 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
27 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
28 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
29 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
30 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 38% | |
31 | JIANG Ryan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
33 | ROUSE Brian G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
34 | CRONIN Darragh J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
35 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | 7% |
36 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 5% | |
37 | PETROV Niki A. | 100% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | DOELEMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 15% | |
39 | KRONROD Tal | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
40 | FULLER George K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
41 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 12% |
42 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 13% |
43 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% |
44 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - |
45 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
46 | ZHANG Thomas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
47 | LAI Boden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
48 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 2% | |
48 | STEVENS James F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
50 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | |
51 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 3% | |
52 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | 18% | 2% | - |
53 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
55 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
56 | JACOVINO Jonathan S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 4% | - |
57 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
58 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
59 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | 1% |
60 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
61 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
62 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
63 | SWIERZEWSKI Tomasz | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
64 | MCILWAIN Wesley D. | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
65 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | SONG Troy | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
68 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
69 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
70 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
71 | FOLEY Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 5% |
72 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 100% | 76% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
73 | ZHANG William | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - |
74 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | |
76 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
77 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
78 | ZEBROSE Cordell B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
78 | MEN Junda | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | |
80 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
81 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 73% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
82 | PAYNE Massimo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 2% | |
83 | QUINLAN Sean | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
84 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | |
85 | JACKSON Nicholas | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
86 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - |
87 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
88 | DELAND Stuart R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | 1% |
89 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | THOMPSON Ian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
91 | MARTONE Matt L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
91 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
93 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 57% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
95 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 94% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
96 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 37% | 6% | - | - |
97 | REINEKE Gerhard | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
97 | REINEKE Alexander | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | BELLIVEAU Shane | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | - |
99 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
101 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
102 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
103 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
104 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
105 | MCCALL Aidan | 100% | 86% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
106 | FRY Nicholas (Nico) J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 11% | |
106 | VINE Ross | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
108 | MURRAY John P. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 2% | - | |
109 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
110 | DEVINE Colin | 100% | 68% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
111 | FENG Du | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
112 | LISANKE Victor | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | NORTON Theo B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
115 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
116 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
117 | BUISINE Sebastien | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
118 | BUISINE Aurelien | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
119 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
120 | SULKIS Adam | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
121 | BUTTS Brendan | 100% | 57% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
121 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
123 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
124 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
125 | DANG Timmy | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.