Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
| 2 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 3 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% | |
| 5 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 6 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 7 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 8 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | |
| 9 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 10 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 11 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | |
| 12 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 13 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 14 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 15 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 18 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 19 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 21 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 24 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 25 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 26 | TANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 27 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 28 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 29 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 7% | |
| 30 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | SIM Ian | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% | |
| 34 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
| 35 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 35 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | 100% | 98% | 70% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 38 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% |
| 39 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | KUANG Bryan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LI zerong | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 12% |
| 44 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | FAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 47 | NAEMI Barsam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 50 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
| 51 | WONG Preston | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 88% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 54 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | YOUNG Quentin | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 59 | WACHS Bryce | 100% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | JU Hanul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 61 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 62 | YAN Eric | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | ZGAMA Oleksii | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 65 | MA Ryan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | WONG Baron | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 67 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 68 | JOHAR Manvik | 100% | 87% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 70 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 71 | RUFANOV Maxim | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 72 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 73 | APEL Gustaf | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 74 | LAU Alex | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 76 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 77 | WANG aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 78 | LI Timothy | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 80 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | NGUYEN Peyton | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 82 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 83 | CHANG Kristopher | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 85 | LEE Royce | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 85 | COLLINS Kaden | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | KIM Remington | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | ORMOND Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 89 | LIN Jason | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 90 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | LI Sean | 100% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | ECKMAN Bjorn | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.