Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANSEN Jonas B. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 3 | JONES Simon A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 3 | DOLGONOS Mark | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 5 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 6 | SAITOC Tudor | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 7 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% | |
| 8 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | FAUBERT Andy C. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 10 | CHIN Ethan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 11 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 12 | LAFVING Brandon | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 13 | KIM William M. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 14 | HERGERT Earl | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
| 15 | MORSE Tyler | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | BEDOR William J. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | MIRANDA Matteo | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | KOKENGE Clark | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | YU Colin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 20 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
| 21 | KIM Juni C. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
| 22 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 23 | SHORT Salim (Sal) A. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 25 | PHO Eric | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | STUSNICK Hunter | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 27 | MERCHANT Reza H. | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 28 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 29 | DIXON Samuel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | O’DEA Anthony | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 31 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | JONES Chinua C. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CULLEN Daniel F. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | CHA Russell W. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 34 | HE Lawrence | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | RHYU Kozmo | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | LAI Coby | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | INSLER Ethan C. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 44 | KANG Michael H. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 45 | CONNELL Jay | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HA Daniel | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 48 | TORDO Garrett | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | WANG Eric S | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 51 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 53 | EKE Frank | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 54 | HERMANSON David B. | 43% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | MUN Chur-Yong | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Matthew | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 57 | MACKIN Samuel | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.