Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HANSEN Jonas B. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | JONES Simon A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | DOLGONOS Mark | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | ZUCKER Noah L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | SAITOC Tudor | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 7 | MARAKOV Allen B. | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | D V D V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | FAUBERT Andy C. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | CHIN Ethan | V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | LAFVING Brandon | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | KIM William M. | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | HERGERT Earl | D V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | MORSE Tyler | D V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | BEDOR William J. | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | MIRANDA Matteo | V D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 18 | KOKENGE Clark | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | YU Colin | V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | D V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | KIM Juni C. | V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | SHORT Salim (Sal) A. | V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 25 | PHO Eric | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | STUSNICK Hunter | V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 27 | MERCHANT Reza H. | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | SHENG Patrick Y. | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | DIXON Samuel | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | O’DEA Anthony | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | JONES Chinua C. | D D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 33 | CULLEN Daniel F. | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | CHA Russell W. | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 34 | HE Lawrence | V D V D V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 36 | RHYU Kozmo | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | BEKKER Mitchel | V V D V D D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | D V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 39 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 40 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 41 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 42 | LAI Coby | D V D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 43 | INSLER Ethan C. | V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 44 | KANG Michael H. | V D D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 45 | CONNELL Jay | D D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | HA Daniel | V D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 47 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 48 | TORDO Garrett | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | WANG Eric S | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | SHAH Maximilian A. | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 52 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 53 | EKE Frank | D D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 54 | HERMANSON David B. | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 55 | MUN Chur-Yong | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 56 | ZHANG Matthew | D D D D D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | |
| 57 | MACKIN Samuel | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.