Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | GUINAN Joseph | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | MICKO Fritz K. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 5 | NGUYEN Tate | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | TUCKER Brad W. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | ROSTAL Scott E. | V V D V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 8 | SUVOROV Yuly | V D D D V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ROUBAILO Niels | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | KANAR Ian | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 11 | SARKAR Anish | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | LEONE III Charles D. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 14 | LING Valdis | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 15 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | GARRETT Samuel | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 17 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 18 | ZHENG Andy | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | WANG William M. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 20 | CORRALES Victor M. | V V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 21 | CHIN Dylan A. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 22 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | MCKEEVER Luca | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | NOWAK Jakub P. | D V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 25 | MITEV Alexander | V V V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 26 | STEELE DeMario A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 27 | JIANG Matthew | V D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 28 | KIM Dylan J. | D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 29 | AGARWAL Adheesh | D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 30 | LI Jesse | V V D V D D | V V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 31 | LOISEAU Eliott | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 32 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 33 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V V V V V | D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 34 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 35 | NDJEKA Jesse | D V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 36 | ROBINSON Matthew | V V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 37 | DENNIS Ethan | D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | CURTY Jack | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 39 | BAILEY William F. | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 40 | VEZMAR Evan H. | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 41 | HEIM Bryce | V D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 42 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 43 | BISSEN Quinn | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 44 | MURPHY Aidan | D D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 45 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 46 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | V D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 47 | SHEPHERD Conner M. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 48 | VANOYEN Dominick | D D D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 49 | GREGORY Abram | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 50 | LIMER Avi | D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 51 | ECKEL Anson J. | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 52 | ZIEGLER John | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 53 | SARKAR agniv | D D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 54 | ZEKO David J. | D D D V V D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 55 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | D V D D V D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 55 | MILLER Lance W. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 57 | ZHENG Jerry | V D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 58 | WILKINSON Derek H. | D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 59 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 60 | MAYER Vinzenz | V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 61 | HERSCOVICI Aaron | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 62 | RAY William | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 63 | BRADFORD Ethan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 64 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 65 | ZHANG Michael | D V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 66 | VARNEY Douglas W. | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 67 | MOHAMED Sabir | D V D V V D | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
| 68 | MCDOWELL Will | D V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 69 | COLEMAN Ian | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 70 | LI Chenyu | D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 71 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 72 | WILLIAMS Logan | V D D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 73 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | V D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 74 | ZHANG James | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 75 | YANG Zeke | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 76 | GINZBURG Adam | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 77 | DHAL Leon | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 78 | MALEADY Sean | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 79 | GRAVES Lawson | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 80 | LASKA Patryk | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 81 | BEACH John | D D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 82 | UNG Kai | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 83 | BARFORD Giovanni | D D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 84 | FRANGER Max | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 85 | VAGGALIS Denny | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 86 | CHEN Bowen | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 87 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 88 | CHU Duong | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 89 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 89 | GROOTHUIS David | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 91 | ST. GEORGE David J. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 92 | TIERNEY Luke | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.