Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JOVANOVIC Jovan - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
2 GUINAN Joseph - - - - 4% 32% 63%
3 ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. - - - - 2% 35% 62%
3 MICKO Fritz K. - - - 6% 33% 44% 17%
5 NGUYEN Tate - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
6 TUCKER Brad W. - - 3% 19% 43% 34%
7 ROSTAL Scott E. - - 3% 17% 44% 37%
8 SUVOROV Yuly 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
9 ROUBAILO Niels - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 21%
10 KANAR Ian - - 3% 21% 42% 28% 6%
11 SARKAR Anish - 4% 23% 40% 27% 6%
12 LEONE III Charles D. - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
13 IVAKIMOV Vasil - - 1% 7% 36% 43% 14%
14 LING Valdis - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 10%
15 THOMAS Samuel - 2% 12% 34% 39% 13%
16 GARRETT Samuel - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
17 SILVERS Ari - - - 3% 15% 40% 42%
18 ZHENG Andy - 1% 6% 28% 41% 20% 3%
19 WANG William M. - - 1% 10% 33% 40% 15%
20 CORRALES Victor M. 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2% -
21 CHIN Dylan A. 5% 26% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
22 NIKOLOV Peter - 1% 7% 26% 42% 25%
23 MCKEEVER Luca - 1% 11% 34% 40% 14%
24 NOWAK Jakub P. - - - 3% 21% 46% 30%
25 MITEV Alexander 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
26 STEELE DeMario A. - - - 6% 26% 47% 21%
27 JIANG Matthew 20% 43% 28% 7% 1% -
28 KIM Dylan J. - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
29 AGARWAL Adheesh 3% 32% 42% 19% 4% -
30 LI Jesse - - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
31 LOISEAU Eliott - 2% 17% 42% 31% 7% -
32 TOLLEFSON Zachary 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
33 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 15% 36% 33% 14% 3% < 1%
34 SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN - 11% 34% 37% 16% 2%
35 NDJEKA Jesse - - - 3% 21% 47% 28%
36 ROBINSON Matthew 1% 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
37 DENNIS Ethan - 5% 23% 41% 26% 5%
38 CURTY Jack 10% 44% 34% 10% 1% -
39 BAILEY William F. - 4% 22% 39% 28% 7%
40 VEZMAR Evan H. - 4% 21% 38% 28% 8%
41 HEIM Bryce - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
42 STENCEL Andrew E. - 2% 13% 38% 34% 11% 1%
43 BISSEN Quinn 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4% -
44 MURPHY Aidan 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2% -
45 GILLHAM Timothy A. - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5%
46 VUILLEMIN Gregoire 15% 42% 34% 9% 1% - -
47 SHEPHERD Conner M. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 8%
48 VANOYEN Dominick 19% 39% 30% 10% 1% - -
49 GREGORY Abram - 5% 25% 41% 24% 4%
50 LIMER Avi 16% 37% 31% 12% 2% -
51 ECKEL Anson J. - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8%
52 ZIEGLER John 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
53 SARKAR agniv 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3% -
54 ZEKO David J. - - < 1% 7% 34% 43% 16%
55 WALKER IV Weymouth D. - - 1% 7% 29% 49% 14%
55 MILLER Lance W. 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
57 ZHENG Jerry 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1% -
58 WILKINSON Derek H. - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13%
59 LUEDECKE Myles A. 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
60 MAYER Vinzenz 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6%
61 HERSCOVICI Aaron 3% 18% 39% 32% 7% 1% -
62 RAY William 5% 21% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
63 BRADFORD Ethan 14% 36% 34% 14% 2% - -
64 OZANNE Jeffrey S. 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 2%
65 ZHANG Michael 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
66 VARNEY Douglas W. 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 5% 1%
67 MOHAMED Sabir 37% 44% 17% 2% - - -
68 MCDOWELL Will 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% - -
69 COLEMAN Ian 11% 40% 34% 12% 2% -
70 LI Chenyu - 6% 25% 40% 25% 5%
71 ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. 2% 19% 41% 29% 8% 1%
72 WILLIAMS Logan 49% 39% 11% 1% - -
73 SOKOLIK Lucas W. - 1% 9% 25% 36% 24% 5%
74 ZHANG James 9% 34% 40% 15% 2% - -
75 YANG Zeke 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% - -
76 GINZBURG Adam 3% 21% 43% 28% 5% - -
77 DHAL Leon 4% 27% 46% 20% 3% - -
78 MALEADY Sean 27% 45% 23% 5% - -
79 GRAVES Lawson 2% 29% 41% 22% 5% -
80 LASKA Patryk 5% 25% 40% 24% 6% -
81 BEACH John - 5% 20% 38% 30% 7% -
82 UNG Kai 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
83 BARFORD Giovanni 67% 29% 4% - - - -
84 FRANGER Max 21% 46% 28% 5% - - -
85 VAGGALIS Denny 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
86 CHEN Bowen 30% 46% 21% 3% - - -
87 SHOEMAKER Oliver 83% 16% 1% - - -
88 CHU Duong 74% 23% 3% - - -
89 WEINSTEIN Ethan 3% 27% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
89 GROOTHUIS David 40% 43% 15% 2% - - -
91 ST. GEORGE David J. 59% 34% 7% 1% - -
92 TIERNEY Luke 9% 29% 34% 21% 6% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.