Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | GUINAN Joseph | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | MICKO Fritz K. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
5 | NGUYEN Tate | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
6 | TUCKER Brad W. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
7 | ROSTAL Scott E. | V V D V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
8 | SUVOROV Yuly | V D D D V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
9 | ROUBAILO Niels | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
10 | KANAR Ian | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
11 | SARKAR Anish | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
12 | LEONE III Charles D. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
14 | LING Valdis | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
15 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
16 | GARRETT Samuel | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
17 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | ZHENG Andy | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | WANG William M. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
20 | CORRALES Victor M. | V V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
21 | CHIN Dylan A. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
22 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | MCKEEVER Luca | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | NOWAK Jakub P. | D V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
25 | MITEV Alexander | V V V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
26 | STEELE DeMario A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
27 | JIANG Matthew | V D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
28 | KIM Dylan J. | D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
29 | AGARWAL Adheesh | D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
30 | LI Jesse | V V D V D D | V V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
31 | LOISEAU Eliott | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
32 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
33 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V V V V V | D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
34 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
35 | NDJEKA Jesse | D V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
36 | ROBINSON Matthew | V V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
37 | DENNIS Ethan | D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
38 | CURTY Jack | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
39 | BAILEY William F. | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
40 | VEZMAR Evan H. | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
41 | HEIM Bryce | V D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
42 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
43 | BISSEN Quinn | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
44 | MURPHY Aidan | D D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
45 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
46 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | V D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
47 | SHEPHERD Conner M. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
48 | VANOYEN Dominick | D D D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
49 | GREGORY Abram | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
50 | LIMER Avi | D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
51 | ECKEL Anson J. | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
52 | ZIEGLER John | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
53 | SARKAR agniv | D D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
54 | ZEKO David J. | D D D V V D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
55 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | D V D D V D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
55 | MILLER Lance W. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
57 | ZHENG Jerry | V D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
58 | WILKINSON Derek H. | D D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
59 | LUEDECKE Myles A. | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
60 | MAYER Vinzenz | V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
61 | HERSCOVICI Aaron | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
62 | RAY William | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
63 | BRADFORD Ethan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
64 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
65 | ZHANG Michael | D V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
66 | VARNEY Douglas W. | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
67 | MOHAMED Sabir | D V D V V D | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
68 | MCDOWELL Will | D V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
69 | COLEMAN Ian | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
70 | LI Chenyu | D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
71 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
72 | WILLIAMS Logan | V D D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
73 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | V D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
74 | ZHANG James | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
75 | YANG Zeke | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
76 | GINZBURG Adam | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
77 | DHAL Leon | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
78 | MALEADY Sean | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
79 | GRAVES Lawson | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
80 | LASKA Patryk | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
81 | BEACH John | D D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
82 | UNG Kai | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
83 | BARFORD Giovanni | D D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
84 | FRANGER Max | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
85 | VAGGALIS Denny | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
86 | CHEN Bowen | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
87 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
88 | CHU Duong | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
89 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
89 | GROOTHUIS David | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
91 | ST. GEORGE David J. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
92 | TIERNEY Luke | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.