NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 2 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | |
| 3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 3 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 5 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% |
| 6 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 7 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 8 | HAN Changhee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 9 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 10 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 11 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 12 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 26% |
| 13 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 14 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 16 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 18 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 19 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 20 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 12% |
| 22 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | - |
| 23 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
| 24 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 27 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GRIGORIEV Eduard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 29 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 30 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 98% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | POPESCU Tudor | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 34 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 35 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 20% | |
| 36 | LIGOS alex M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 37 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 38 | HU Robin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 39 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | - |
| 40 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 41 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 14% | 1% | |
| 42 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
| 43 | YOON Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 44 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 45 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 46 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 1% |
| 47 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 49 | XU Ethan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 51 | PETERSON Dale | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | WU DING-JUN | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | WU Dawei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 55 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | TJON Calum | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LEE Jason N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 58 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | LI Ayren | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 63 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 87% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 65 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 98% | 78% | 29% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 95% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | FENG Michael | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | BAI Brian | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | GE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | GARCIA HERNANDEZ Lucas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 74 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 75 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 72% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 76 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 78 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 79 | HAYLON Caleb | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 80 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 82 | TANG Terry | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 83 | AMRANI David | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 78% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 85 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | SABATINO Patrick | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | BARBANEL Joseph | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | TESSMAN Henry | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 90 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.