Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Stewart S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
2 | CHEN Leonardo | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 6% |
3 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
3 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
5 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
6 | DODIN David | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
7 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
8 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
9 | ATKINS Levi H. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
10 | LI Zachary | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
11 | HU Anton | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
12 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
13 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
14 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
15 | SONG Troy | - | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
16 | PAN Tristan | - | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
17 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
18 | ZHAO Zidong | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
19 | LIU Adam | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
20 | WONG King-Yee | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
21 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
22 | CHEN Jayden | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
23 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
24 | CHAI Ethan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
25 | BRODSKY Julian | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
26 | WANG Tony | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | DAN Rex | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
29 | GOON Tristan Yang | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
30 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
31 | HU Robert J. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
32 | LEE Wyatt | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
33 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 1% | 10% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | JIANG ryan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
35 | DURKIN Brian | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
36 | ALABI Tobi | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
37 | SONG Changze | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | TRAN Spencer | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
39 | AHMED Mohsen | 2% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | OCONNOR Paul | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
41 | REPIC Oliver | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
42 | GAO Victor | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | ZHAO Pierce | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
44 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
45 | DURKIN Hudson | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
46 | YU Samuel | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
47 | DUKO Phillip | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
48 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
49 | LI Jade | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
50 | NILSEN Mark | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
50 | KWON Aaron | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | PAN Anthony | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
53 | RIM Eugene | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
54 | YIN Chujun | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
55 | TESFAYE Elias | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
57 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
58 | ZHANG Roland | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
59 | KIM Samuel | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
60 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 12% | 46% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
60 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
62 | BAZZANA Beniamino | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | RVACHEV Michael | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
64 | LI Ray | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
65 | KAPLAN Maddox | 34% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
66 | BARATY Teagan | 50% | 45% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
67 | ALAM Rajan | 39% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
68 | LI Jaden | 36% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.