Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 2 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 3 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 5 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
| 6 | TAN Elan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 7 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 9 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 11 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 12 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 11% | |
| 13 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 14 | WONG Baron | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 15 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 16 | CHOI San | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
| 18 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | 3% | |
| 20 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | 8% | |
| 21 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 22 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 23 | KARAMAGA Ganza | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | MIAO Quentin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 27 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
| 28 | GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ Eder | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 3% | |
| 30 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Devin | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | LI Zerong | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 34 | TANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | CHARETTE Matt | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LEE Royce | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 39 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 39 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | KIM Remington | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHEONG Cameron | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | SHEN Orlando | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 50 | CAMP Ryder | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | PEAKE Santiago | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | KOU Mason | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | POSSON Luke | 100% | 88% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.