Academy of Fencing Masters - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BIDA Sergey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 63% |
| 2 | STRONG Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
| 3 | KHAYAT Ziad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
| 5 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 20% | 2% |
| 6 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 7 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 15% |
| 8 | BIDA Violetta | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 9 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
| 11 | NICHOLSON Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 12 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 13 | BOYCE Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 14 | ZMURK Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 15 | CAMPBELL-KRUGER Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | - |
| 16 | SODHI Jaco | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 17 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 18 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 9% |
| 19 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 20 | COHEN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 24% |
| 21 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | LI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% |
| 23 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 24 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 7% |
| 25 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 35% | 5% |
| 26 | JAKLITSCH Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 27 | SOULAIRE Tom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 28 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 29 | YAO Shun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% | 1% |
| 30 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 36 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 37 | SIU Darren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | WU Steven | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | LIU Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
| 42 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 43 | ACKERMANN Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 7% |
| 44 | DEMANGONE Reed | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LIN Jason | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SIU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 49 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | ELZAYN Hadi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 51 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 52 | NGUYEN Grayson | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | NIKIFOROV Timofei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 53 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | SIM Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 57 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 59 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | LOMIO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | WONG Preston | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 96% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 64 | LI Sean | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | BECK Brian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 66 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 67 | LIU Yichen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 68 | LI Chester | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 69 | GUO Woody | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 70 | XU Yanwen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | POON Desiree | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 75 | XU Celina | 100% | 90% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | ZHUANG Lauren | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | DWIGGINS Reese | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 78 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 80 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | LIU Nathan | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 82 | LIN Shenghai | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 83 | KROTZ Gemma | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 85 | NGUYEN Peyton | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | BOHRMAN Daniel | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LEE Emily | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 89 | YUNG Bethany | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.