Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 27% | |
| 2 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
| 3 | KING Cameron | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 5 | STEVENS Daniel | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
| 6 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 7 | KIM Donghyeok | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 8 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 9 | HERMANSON David B. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | KROPP Jack | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 11 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 12 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 13 | LI Benjamin | - | 4% | 31% | 44% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | SALISBURY Cary | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 16 | ADLER Ethan M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 17 | LU Sebastian X. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | CHEN Eric | - | 3% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 5% | |
| 19 | LEE JUNYOUNG | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 20 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | - | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
| 21 | BLUM Oliver | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | YI Jason | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | LIU John | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 24 | MUN Chur-Yong | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | CHONG christopher | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 25 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CLICK Aiden | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% | |
| 28 | WANG Tristan | - | 4% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 29 | NORTH Alexander M. | - | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | FU Ethan | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | TRIMMER Colin | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | CHOI Marcus | 48% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | REITINGER Luke M. | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | ILYAS Zakariya | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | HOPKINS Samuel | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | DAVIS Jonah | 46% | 46% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | KIM Ryan | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 39 | LAM Bill | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MING Isaac | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHANG Caden | 34% | 56% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 43 | ZHANG Andy | 37% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | SUMMER Zachary | 18% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | CUMPSTON Ashton | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.