Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | |
| 2 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 3 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 5 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% |
| 6 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | |
| 7 | KIM Donghyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 8 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 9 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 11 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 12 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% |
| 13 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 2% | |
| 14 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 3% | |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 16 | ADLER Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 17 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
| 19 | LEE JUNYOUNG | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 20 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 21 | BLUM Oliver | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | YI Jason | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | LIU John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 24 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 25 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% | |
| 28 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | |
| 29 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | FU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | REITINGER Luke M. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | HOPKINS Samuel | 100% | 51% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 54% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 39 | LAM Bill | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MING Isaac | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 66% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 63% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | SUMMER Zachary | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | CUMPSTON Ashton | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.