Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
2 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
3 | MURRAY Maximo | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
3 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
5 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
6 | LO Conrad | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% | |
7 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
8 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
9 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
10 | JI Evan | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
11 | KUO Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
12 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
13 | CHOI Samuel | - | - | 6% | 31% | 48% | 14% | |
14 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
15 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
16 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
17 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
18 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
19 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
20 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
21 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
22 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
23 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
24 | FINLEY Dylan | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
25 | JIANG Owen | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
26 | CHI Alexander | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
27 | WHITE Austin M. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
28 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
29 | JAIN Aditya | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 19% | |
30 | KIM Derek A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
31 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
32 | LIN Michael | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | SHEN Luke R. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | KIM Minhyeok | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
35 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
36 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 3% | |
37 | WECHSLER Jacob | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
39 | HUANG Kevin D. | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
40 | TAN Christien | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
41 | TEH Ryan | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
42 | HUANG Eythan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
43 | CHEN Junxuan | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
44 | MA Andrew | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
45 | TORRES Treston | - | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | REYES Omar | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
47 | SHEN Troy R. | 6% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | |
48 | LI Matthew | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
49 | TANG Owen S. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
50 | LEE Jacob J | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
51 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | - |
51 | CHIN Ryan | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
53 | REEVES Liam | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
54 | STEVENS Paul S. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
55 | LIU Michael H. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
56 | LLIDO Soren | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
57 | FINNEY Lorenz | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
58 | WEEKS Richard P. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
59 | TUAN Evan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
60 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
61 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
62 | KIM Adrian | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
63 | LI Chenglang Ryan | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
64 | ANDRIC Borna | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | BARRETT Austin | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
66 | LI Jett | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
67 | KIM Ryan Y. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
68 | WANG Brayden | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
69 | CAPRA Ethan | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
69 | APPL Eli | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
71 | MANICKAM Varun | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
73 | SINGH Kushaal | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
74 | OH Jaden | 17% | 49% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
75 | MA Bryant | 5% | 36% | 43% | 14% | 1% | - | |
76 | JIANG Raymond | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
77 | THOMSON Champa | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
78 | ZHANG Luke | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
79 | STERNBERG Ira M. | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
80 | STERNBERG Moses A. | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.