Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
2 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
3 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
3 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
5 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 40% |
6 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
7 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
8 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
9 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 5% |
10 | XIAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
11 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
12 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
13 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
14 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
15 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
16 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
17 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
18 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
19 | FREL Vincent | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 3% |
20 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
21 | YANG Luca | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
22 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
23 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
24 | LIU Yilin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
25 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
26 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
27 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
29 | TARCHICHI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
30 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
31 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
32 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | |
33 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | - |
34 | LIN Joshua | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
35 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
36 | SPERBER Miles | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
38 | GOLI Arush | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
39 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
40 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
40 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
42 | DAVIDSON Henry | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
43 | SHAW eric | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
44 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
45 | CASCONE Raffaele | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
46 | KEEGAN Cole | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
48 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
49 | JUVVADI Pratham | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
50 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
51 | MOORE Quinn | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
52 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
53 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
54 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
55 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
56 | SPEZAKIS Achilles | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
57 | HONG Thomas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
57 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
59 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
60 | MCCORMICK Chase | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
61 | FOMIN Dash | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
62 | JIANG Ethan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
63 | SHINDE Aksh | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
64 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
65 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
67 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
69 | HUNTER khelile | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
70 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
71 | SALEH yassin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
72 | NAYAK Saideep | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
73 | ZHANG Vincent | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.