Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
2 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
3 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
5 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
6 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
7 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
8 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
9 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
10 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
11 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
12 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
13 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
14 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
15 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
16 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
17 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
18 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
19 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
20 | LI Ray | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
21 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
22 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
23 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
24 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
25 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 6% |
26 | LI Jade | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
28 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
29 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
30 | YANG Alex | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
31 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
32 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
33 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
34 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
35 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
36 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
37 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
37 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
39 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
41 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
42 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
43 | WANG Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
44 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
45 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
46 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
47 | WANG Charles | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
48 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
49 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
50 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
51 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
52 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
53 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
53 | KIM Zac | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
55 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
56 | NG Nico | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
57 | OCONNOR Paul | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
58 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
59 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
60 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
61 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
62 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
63 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
64 | ZHANG Marcus | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
66 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
67 | GU Eric | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
68 | LI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
69 | LEE Henry | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
70 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
71 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
72 | MARIN Ayan N. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
72 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
74 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
75 | TSANG Aiden | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
76 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | - |
77 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
78 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
79 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
80 | AU Joshua | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
82 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
83 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
84 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
85 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
86 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
87 | YU David | 100% | 89% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
88 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
89 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
89 | PENG Ethan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | ZHANG Shuhao | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
92 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
93 | LIN ZIJIE | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
94 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
94 | SI Anderson | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
96 | LEE Kalvin | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.