Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
2 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
3 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
3 | TAO Jiemi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
5 | JIN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
6 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
7 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
8 | HUA Isaac | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
9 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
10 | LU Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% |
11 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
12 | JIANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
13 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 13% | |
14 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
15 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
16 | SU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
17 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
18 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
19 | YU Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
20 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
21 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
22 | XU Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
23 | QIAN Will | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
24 | CHEN Dante | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
25 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 2% |
25 | XU ETHAN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
27 | WANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
28 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
29 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
30 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
31 | BUCHNER Roland | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
32 | KUTATELADZE Danieli | 100% | 98% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
33 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
34 | YU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | - |
35 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 28% |
36 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% |
37 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
38 | RAY William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
39 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
40 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
41 | LIN Tyler | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | JIAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
43 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
44 | XU Jaden | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
45 | PARK Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
46 | MOORE Quinn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
46 | YANG Crescent | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
48 | MADDES Gage | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
48 | YOON Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
50 | CASCONE Raffaele | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
51 | SHEN Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
52 | TARDIFF Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
53 | LIU Mason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
54 | MENZEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 1% |
55 | FANG Lionel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
56 | JAZWINSKI Archer | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
57 | LIN Alexander | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
59 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
60 | GRIFFIN Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
61 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
62 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
63 | SU Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
64 | WANG Leon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
65 | JIA Evan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
66 | WU Yulen | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
67 | CHIN Gregory | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
68 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
69 | JIANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
70 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
71 | XIA Wenhao | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
72 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
73 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
74 | LIANG Anker | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
75 | BUCHNER Theodore | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | WU Connor | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | HAN Jayden | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
78 | FAN Oscar | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
79 | STARK Ethan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
80 | CHEN Jesse | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
81 | WU Kangdi | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
82 | MOSAMEH Faraj | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
83 | ZHANG alex | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
83 | LI Ethan | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
85 | LU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | DAYAL Dax | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
87 | XIONG Jeffrey | 100% | 90% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
88 | SHUM Wesley | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
89 | XIE Eric | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
90 | SANCHEZ-BOROVSKAYA Maximilian | 100% | 73% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
91 | CREMEL Louis | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | MA Li | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
93 | CAMIOLO Jacob | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
94 | ZHANG Vincent | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | FOX Cameron | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.