Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 2 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 41% | |
| 3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 5 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 7 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% | |
| 8 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 11 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 13 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 14 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 15 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 20 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
| 21 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 26 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 28 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 29 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | HUGHES Evan J. | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 32 | GAO William | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 34 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 35 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | QIU Daniel | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 42 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 43 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 47 | SAGE Michael J. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 49 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 95% | 59% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | FOTENOS Noah T. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | WANG Jeremy | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SELLERY Robert M. | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ROBBINS Tusker F. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.