Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Avan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% |
2 | TAN benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
3 | SUN Roy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
3 | LIN Sampson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
5 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 1% |
6 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
7 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
8 | LIU Zichen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
9 | MENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
10 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
11 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
12 | CHONG Tanner | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
13 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
14 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
15 | CAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
16 | GU Evan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
17 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 16% |
18 | MENG Eric | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
19 | BAGWELL Theodore | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | YIN Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | - |
21 | XU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
22 | ZHANG alex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
23 | ZHANG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
24 | CHANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
25 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | - |
26 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
27 | RAMZAN Haaris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
28 | PHILLIPS Julian | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
29 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
30 | THIMIRI Trishaan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
31 | CHEN Liam Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
32 | CHEN Ian | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | LIN Evan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | ANDERSON Stellan | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
36 | WANG Eavan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
37 | LEE Elliot | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
38 | NEWMAN August | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | LACE Kal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
40 | WU William | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
40 | MALAKAN Noah | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
42 | KHANDAN MILAN | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.