Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
2 | JU Jennifer | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
3 | ZHANG Jane | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
3 | KANE Alexa | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
5 | OLELE Ifechi | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
6 | LIN Alexis | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 20% | |
7 | LEE Kate | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
8 | JIANG chenxi | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
9 | CHEN Stephanie | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
10 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
11 | FAN Joy | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
12 | PEKKER Adel | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
13 | LI Ariel | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
14 | YANG Arianna | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
15 | HOWARD Katherine | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | KWASNY Natalie | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
17 | RAJ Indra | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
18 | MARKS Madeline | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | PEKKER Amina | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
20 | MEGGERS Arya | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
21 | YU Chloe | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
22 | ZHANG Ashley | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
23 | XIE ANDREA | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | GU Ella | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
25 | LAW Mila | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 6% | |
26 | CHEN Laila | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
27 | CAI Melody | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
28 | LI Yishi | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
29 | CHEN Reina | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
30 | ALLIEVI Simone | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
31 | EDGAR Koko | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% | |
32 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | FRANGER Emma | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
34 | LAI Juliet | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
35 | CHAVEZ Beatrix | 12% | 44% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | JIANG Alexandra | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
37 | FAN Olivia | 6% | 32% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
38 | DOMONKOS Mary Alanna | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
39 | YOUNG Penelope | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
40 | NEGRUT Sabina | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | TUMULA Anima | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | JERDEE Saige | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
43 | PURUSHOTHAM Nina | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | HUANG Cynthia | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.