National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 25% |
| 2 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 3 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 5 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 29% |
| 6 | DODIN David | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% | |
| 8 | KIM Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 9 | BRODSKY Julian | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 10 | SU Caleb | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Kingston | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | SILVERS Ari | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 13 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 14 | PARK Nicholas | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | KRIVAK Blaise | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 16 | LEWIS Jonathan | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 18 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
| 19 | KIM Brandon | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | YU Jason | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 21 | WOLFE Alex | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SAUNIER Cameron | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 23 | CHEN Brian | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 8% |
| 24 | GINZBURG Adam | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | BANSAL Arjun | 7% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 26 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 8% | 42% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | ROLAND Mackinley | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | JONES Reilly | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LEE Aiden | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LEE John | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BRADSHAW Carter | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | FANG Hanning | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 34 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 35 | SNYDER Simian | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | KIM Jaden | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 37 | TAYLOR JASPER E. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | LU Nathan | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | SHENG Harry | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | MILLER Andrew | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | LURYE Benjamin | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | FARBER Ian S. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZHENG Andy | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 38% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | ALI Farhan | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.