National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KHANNA Nikhil | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 3 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 5 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | DODIN David | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | KIM Nathan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | BRODSKY Julian | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | SU Caleb | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 11 | ZHANG Kingston | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 12 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | LOISEAU Eliott | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 14 | PARK Nicholas | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 15 | KRIVAK Blaise | V V D D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | LEWIS Jonathan | V D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 17 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | V D V V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 19 | KIM Brandon | D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | YU Jason | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | WOLFE Alex | V D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | SAUNIER Cameron | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 23 | CHEN Brian | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | GINZBURG Adam | D V V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 25 | BANSAL Arjun | D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | SANTOS Antonio K. | V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | ROLAND Mackinley | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | JONES Reilly | V V D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 29 | SANTOS Francisco M. | D D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | LEE Aiden | D V V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | LEE John | D D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | BRADSHAW Carter | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | FANG Hanning | V V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 34 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 35 | SNYDER Simian | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 36 | KIM Jaden | V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 37 | TAYLOR JASPER E. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 38 | LU Nathan | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SHENG Harry | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 40 | MILLER Andrew | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | LURYE Benjamin | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | FARBER Ian S. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 43 | ZHENG Andy | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 45 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 46 | ALI Farhan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.