Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DODIN Daniel M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | KIM Gene | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | WHITE Ryden | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
3 | TANG Michael | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
5 | MOU Jaydon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
6 | MIDYANY Ryan | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
7 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
8 | XUE Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
9 | CHANG Matthew | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
10 | LIU Austin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
11 | MIKHAIL Lucas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
12 | LIN Henry | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
13 | KATS Brandon | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
14 | ZHANG jonathan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
15 | RUBIN Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
16 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
17 | KROPP Wesley | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
18 | YAO Tristan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
19 | MA Nolan | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
20 | ZENG Oliver | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
21 | MOSTOVOY philip | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
22 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
23 | WU MiEr | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
24 | FU Nolan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
25 | KIM Doyun | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
26 | ZHOU Luke | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
27 | ROBERTS Arthur | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
28 | KICIMAN Leo | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
29 | KIM Julian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
30 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
32 | CHEN Christopher | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
33 | WONG Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
34 | WU Nathan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
35 | DANG William | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | < 1% |
36 | ZHENG Jason | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
37 | CHIANG William | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
38 | WU Matthew | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 17% |
39 | HEADRICK Liam | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
40 | SHIM Jae | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
41 | MOSLEY Wally | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
42 | DING Max | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
43 | RONG Marcus | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
44 | DANILOV Artur | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
45 | BHANDARE Veer | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
46 | ZHANG Chaoyi(Joey) | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
47 | WONG Alexander | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
48 | FONG Kobe | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
49 | CAMP William | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
50 | TOPRANI Valmik | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
51 | YAO Ryan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
52 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
53 | SHOURIE Neel | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
54 | LEE Leo | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
55 | MYRAH Devin | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
56 | THOMAS Andrew | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
57 | TANG Colin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
58 | PERRY Noah | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
59 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | - |
60 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | YU Brandon | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
61 | TIAN Dylan | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
63 | MBERIA Henry | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
64 | LIU Andrew | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
65 | PUTHOFF Henry | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
66 | HWANG Matthew | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 3% |
67 | WANG Lucas | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
68 | LIN Bryan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
69 | PARRA Lucas | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
70 | PARKE Nathaniel | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
71 | YAO Aiden | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
72 | LIN Daniel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
73 | SONG Aidan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
74 | FEELY Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
75 | YOO Lucas | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
76 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
77 | LEE Lucas | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
78 | VASILEV Victor | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 4% |
79 | SONG Eric | 9% | 27% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | DU Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
81 | CHEN Jayden A | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
82 | MA Joseph | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
83 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
84 | CHEN Aiden | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
85 | LI Stephen | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
85 | BEN-YOSEPH Rafael | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
87 | ELLIS, IV Floyd | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
88 | SHIM Jaeyoo | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
88 | LIU Xuyao | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
90 | KROTZ Nicolas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
91 | HANTOV Adrian | - | 3% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
92 | GUJJA Rishabh | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 1% |
93 | HUA Nolan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
94 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
95 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
96 | KHERSONSKY Robert | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
97 | GARIKIPATI Tharan | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
98 | LI Nolan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
98 | LEE James K. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
100 | ZHANG Aiden | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
101 | CHEN Linus | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
102 | LEE Joshua | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
102 | ENG Kyler | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
104 | ZHAN ETHAN | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
104 | SHI Zhicheng | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
106 | DAI Jason | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
106 | SCHIPPER Johann | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
108 | KICIMAN Louis | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
109 | LUO Alvin Y. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
110 | SHAPIRO Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
111 | PARK Ethan | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
112 | LEE Harrison | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
113 | BORAN Brooks | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
114 | GEVA Reuben | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
115 | SHAO Mason | 5% | 19% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
116 | WONG Kyle | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
117 | LIU Yihong | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
118 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
119 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 1% | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
120 | FERREIRA DE MELO Martin | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
121 | NOOL Aaron | 1% | 8% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
122 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
123 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
123 | CHEN Regis | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
125 | DUCHNOWSKI Thiesson | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
126 | QI Bryan | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
127 | HOLDEN Harrison | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
128 | YANG Rony | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
129 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
130 | ZALPURI Zorin | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
131 | NGUYEN Norris | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | - |
132 | ZHAO Brandon | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
133 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
134 | FU Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | - |
135 | WU Jiachen | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
136 | GUO Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
137 | LI Vance | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
138 | CHU Clayton | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
139 | WEI Noah | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
140 | FRIZZELL Kai | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
141 | IVANOV Andrew | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
142 | YOON Ian | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
143 | SHOURIE Seth | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
144 | CHEN Benjamin | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
145 | JU Shang | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
146 | WU James | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
147 | LAI Jayden | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
148 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
149 | YUE Bryan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
150 | YI Alexander | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
151 | WANG carson | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
152 | LU Ian | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | - |
153 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
154 | PARK Sean | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
155 | CHEN Zhi-yang | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
156 | BUTLER Xavier | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
157 | KESELMAN Ron | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
158 | LIU YULIN | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
159 | ZHANG Jenson | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
159 | LI Kingston | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
161 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
162 | LIN Edison | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
163 | REN Mark | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
164 | DESAI Jairaj | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
165 | WANG Mason | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
166 | YU Rex | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
167 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
168 | WANG Henry | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
169 | ZHAO Luke | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
170 | YAO Irvine | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
171 | MASKIN Mikhail | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
171 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
173 | CHI Zachary | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
174 | FRENCH Drake | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
174 | LAI Jaxon | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
176 | ZHOU Silvan | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
177 | DISPENZA Jayan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
177 | QU ethan | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
179 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
179 | WANG William | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
181 | GAYNER Matthew | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
182 | YE Andrew | 24% | 47% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
182 | GAO Guanyi (Jonathan) | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
184 | FRANK Luke | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
185 | MATUSOW Brandon | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
186 | YOU Emmanuel | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
187 | KIM Siwoo | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
188 | XIONG Alec | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
189 | VISSER Liam | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
189 | YAN Milan | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
191 | LENEGHAN Declan | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
192 | SI Alexander | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
193 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
193 | MAXWELL Taiga | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
195 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
195 | FEELY Samuel | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
197 | KO Ethan | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
198 | WANG Franklin | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
199 | SAFAI Bardia | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
199 | ZHANG Jacob | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
199 | FILIPKOWSKI Elden | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
202 | LEE Samuel | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
203 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
204 | TALANDZEVICIUS Tomas | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
205 | THOMSON Piers | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
205 | SATHYAN Dhruv | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.