Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
2 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
3 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
3 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
5 | OSBORN Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
6 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
7 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
8 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
9 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
10 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
11 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
12 | SHOUSHA Hamza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
13 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
15 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
16 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
17 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
18 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
19 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
20 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 4% |
21 | LEE Henry | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
22 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
23 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
23 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
25 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
26 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
27 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
28 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
29 | MIKHAIL Lucas | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
30 | SATISHKUMAR Pranav | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
31 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | RICHMOND Ozan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% | ||
34 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | ||
35 | MAKOLO Hudson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
36 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | ||
38 | LIN Haley | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
39 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
40 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
41 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
42 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
42 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | ZAHRAN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
44 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
46 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
46 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
48 | HE Bronto | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
49 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
50 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
51 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
51 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
53 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
54 | TSEN Mason | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
55 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
57 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | ||
58 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
59 | MASSIE Jay | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
60 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
61 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
62 | GRIGGS Kaiden | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
63 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
64 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | SHILOV Maxim | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
66 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
67 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
68 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
69 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
70 | SMOTHERS Nathan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
71 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
72 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
73 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
74 | DAVIS Andrew | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
75 | LEE Carson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
77 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
77 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
79 | YU David | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
80 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
81 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
82 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
82 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
84 | WILKERSON Tobias | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
85 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
87 | BAYUS Oliver | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
88 | JONES Gideon | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
89 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
90 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 2% | ||
91 | ALABI Azryl | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
92 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
93 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
94 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
95 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
96 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
97 | GUO Lucas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.