Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Adam L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 3 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% |
| 5 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 50% | 22% |
| 5 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 7 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 8 | CHOI Samuel | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 9 | OH Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 10 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 12 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 13 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 14 | YANG Luao | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 15 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 17% | |
| 16 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 5% | |
| 17 | KUO Evan | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 18 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 20 | REYES Omar | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 21 | REEVES Liam | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | WOO Christian | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MO Jason | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | PIERCE Cody | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | NAM Michael | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 27 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 29 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WONG Adrian | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 32 | KHER Roan | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | KIM Ryan Y. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | GAO William | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 35 | OH SEAN | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
| 36 | LI Peihong | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | GATZA Logan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | CAPRA Ethan | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | OH Joshua | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | LLIDO Soren | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | TAN Christien | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | OH Jaden | 8% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | BAO Aaron | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 49 | GAO Ryan | - | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | WEEKS Richard P. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 51 | FINLEY Dylan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 52 | WONG Antonio | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 55 | SHEN Troy R. | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ROSS III Paul D. | 6% | 35% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LAKE Wyatt J. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 60 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 60 | SHEN Luke R. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LIU Michael H. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 63 | KIM Adrian | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | 18% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | YOUNGBLOOD Woody C. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | TSAO Lukas | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | QIU Tengjie | 51% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | WANG Ethan | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 71 | STERNBERG Moses A. | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 72 | XU Ethan | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | CHEN Jaden K. | 10% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | BARRETT Austin | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | STERNBERG Ira M. | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.