Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
2 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
3 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
3 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
5 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 22% |
5 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
7 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
8 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
9 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
10 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
11 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
12 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
13 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
14 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
15 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 17% | |
16 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | 5% | |
17 | KUO Evan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
18 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
19 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
20 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
21 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
22 | WOO Christian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | MO Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
22 | PIERCE Cody | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | NAM Michael | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
27 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
28 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
29 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
29 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
32 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
33 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | GAO William | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
36 | LI Peihong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
37 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
38 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
39 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
40 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
41 | OH Joshua | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
42 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
44 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
45 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
46 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | 2% |
47 | OH Jaden | 100% | 92% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | |
48 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
49 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | - |
50 | WEEKS Richard P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
51 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
52 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
52 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
54 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
55 | SHEN Troy R. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
56 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
57 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
58 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 94% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | |
59 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
60 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
60 | SHEN Luke R. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
63 | KIM Adrian | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
64 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
65 | YOUNGBLOOD Woody C. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
66 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | QIU Tengjie | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
68 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
69 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
70 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
71 | STERNBERG Moses A. | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
72 | XU Ethan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
73 | CHEN Jaden K. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
74 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
75 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
76 | STERNBERG Ira M. | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.