Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG DEVON | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 2 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | GAITHER Christopher W. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KHANNA Nikhil | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 5 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 6 | LEE Seungwon | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | IMREK Elijah S. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | MUGA Aiden | D V V D V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 9 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | KIM Nathan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | AYALA Nayen L. | V V V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 13 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | BARG Jonathan | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | GOMEZ Chase S. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | WOLFE Alex | D D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | FERRIERE Joshua | V V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | KIMPEL Drew R. | D V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | HESSE Hans | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | LO Jake | V D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | DAO Alexander | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | KARNAS Karol | D V D D V D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 24 | BAZHENOV Anthony | V D V D D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 25 | STANTIAL Grant | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | ROMANOV Ethan | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 27 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 28 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 29 | XIONG Aaron | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | CHIN Dylan A. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | VAN VACTER Thomas | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 32 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | D D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 33 | OLSON Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 34 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 35 | PATEL Avi S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.