Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 2 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 33% | 64% |
| 3 | BAE Junnie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 5 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 34% |
| 6 | DESHMUKH Ayush | - | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 7 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 8 | WONG Adam L. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 60% | 22% |
| 9 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 46% | 43% |
| 11 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | LIN Dashiell | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 13 | AVRON Case B. | 2% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | OH SEAN | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 15 | MURRAY Maximo | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 17 | YANG Luao | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 18 | LI Peihong | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 19 | NEWELL Ian A. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | CHOI Samuel | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 21 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 23 | REYES Omar | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 24 | DANKAR Neel | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 25 | KLEPKO Gleb | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SONG Dylan S. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 27 | GOOR Julian | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 28 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 8% | 53% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
| 30 | CHENG Nathan | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MARICONDA Christopher | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | FINNEY Lorenz | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | REEVES Liam | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 34 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 35 | SHA Yi Peng | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 36 | SHEN Troy R. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 37 | GILLIAM Jason E. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | FINLEY Dylan | 6% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | KUO Evan | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | WONG Adrian | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 42 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 43 | PRASANNA Advaith | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 44 | YANG Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 45 | SHEN Luke R. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 47 | TAN Christien | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | GAO William | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 49 | KHER Roan | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ROSS III Paul D. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JI Aidan Y. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | PIERCE Cody | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | ZHENG Jadon | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | XU Ethan | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | GARCIA Dylan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | PIERCE Logan | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.