Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DICKSON Farr R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | GRIFFIN John O. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | BAE Junnie | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | DESHMUKH Ayush | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
7 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
8 | WONG Adam L. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
9 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
10 | ZHAO Jason L. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
11 | DORAN Wesley C. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
12 | LIN Dashiell | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
13 | AVRON Case B. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
14 | OH SEAN | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | MURRAY Maximo | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
17 | YANG Luao | V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
18 | LI Peihong | V V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
19 | NEWELL Ian A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
20 | CHOI Samuel | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
21 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
22 | SONG Aiden S. | D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
23 | REYES Omar | V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
24 | DANKAR Neel | V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
25 | KLEPKO Gleb | V V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
26 | SONG Dylan S. | V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
27 | GOOR Julian | V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
28 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
29 | GODZHIK Zachary | V D D D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
30 | CHENG Nathan | D D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
31 | MARICONDA Christopher | D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
32 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
33 | REEVES Liam | V V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
34 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | D V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
35 | SHA Yi Peng | D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
36 | SHEN Troy R. | D D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
37 | GILLIAM Jason E. | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
38 | FINLEY Dylan | D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
39 | KUO Evan | V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
40 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
41 | WONG Adrian | D V D V D D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
42 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
43 | PRASANNA Advaith | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | YANG Andrew | D D V D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
45 | SHEN Luke R. | V D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
46 | ZHOU Oscar J. | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
47 | TAN Christien | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
48 | GAO William | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
49 | KHER Roan | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
50 | ROSS III Paul D. | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
51 | JI Aidan Y. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
52 | PIERCE Cody | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
53 | ZHENG Jadon | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
54 | LAKE Wyatt J. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
55 | ROBINSON Elliot G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
56 | XU Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
56 | GARCIA Dylan | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
58 | PIERCE Logan | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.