American Challenge SYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Saturday, April 19, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 NORMILE Nicholas V V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.3 6 +1.7
2 SANTOS Antonio K. D V D D V D V V V V V V D 4.5 2 -2.5
3 BEALS Alden V V D V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 MANN Jake R. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
5 WONG King-Yee V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
6 WU Jonathan D V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
7 LEE Aiden V V D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
8 LIN Nathan D V V D D V V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
9 SVERDLOV Seth V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 HU Robert J. V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
11 XIA Dashan V V D V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
12 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) V V V V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
13 DUKO Phillip V V V D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
14 LEE JoonWon V V V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
15 HOWARD Jackson V V V V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
16 DURKIN Brian V D V V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
17 GUMEDELLI Mohnish V V V V V V V V D 3.2 6 +2.8
18 BOUDREAUX James V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
19 WANG justin V V D V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
20 TRAN Spencer V V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
21 SIYANKO Joshua D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
22 SANTOS Francisco M. V V D D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
22 LIDSKY Phineas V V V D V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
24 RIM Eugene V V D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
25 WANG Tony V D V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
26 ANAFI Ari V D V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
27 HE Bronto V V V V D D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
28 BAJAJ Nakul V V D D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
29 LEE DoWon D V D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
30 ZOGRAFOS Nicholas V D D V D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
31 CHEN Allen D D V V D D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
32 KIM Gene D V D D D D V V D 3.4 1 -2.4
33 CORBIN Bennett V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
34 MEN Junda D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
35 AHMED Mohsen V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
36 RADENOVIC Vukan V V V V V D V D 5.4 5 -0.4
37 REPIC Oliver V V V V V D V D 4.2 5 +0.8
38 LI Morgan D V V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
39 SHONEMAN Sam V D D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
40 JIANG Matthew V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 ACAR Devin V V D V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
42 GLUSHKOV David V V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
43 SINGLETON Aman D D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
44 KIM Henry D V V V V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
44 CHEN Jayden V D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 YI Nathan V V D D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
47 SONG Changze D D V V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
48 MEHROTRA Neel V D D V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
49 HAN Keyi D D V V V D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
50 ADDYSON Aidan V D D V V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
51 HELMY Richard D D V V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
52 FUSSMAN Yuval D V D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
52 YU Samuel D V D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
54 ZHAI Avalo D V V V D D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
55 PETERSEN Zachary V D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
56 KARIMOV Amir D D D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
57 WU Chi Kuan D V D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
58 WANG Marcus V D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
59 OTTAVIANO Aaron D D D D V V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
60 CRESPO Nathaniel Justus V D D D D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
61 LEE Henry D D V D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
62 LIU Jeremiah W. V D V D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
63 LI Jade D D V D D D V D 3.3 1 -2.3
64 EMMERT JP V D D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
65 DURKIN Tristan E. V V V V D D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 BRADSHAW Carter V V V D V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
67 MCMILLAN Jackson V. V V V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
68 PARKE Nathaniel V D D V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
69 SUBRAMANIAM Sahil D V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
70 FENG Du V V V D V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
71 WONG Maximus V V V D D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
72 CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau V D V V D D D 3.8 3 -0.8
73 YIN Chujun V V D V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
74 WU Jerry V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
75 ROSIELLO Francesco V V V D D D D 1.6 3 +1.4
76 RADZIKOWSKI Sam D V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
76 CUELLAR Markus D D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
78 ZHANG Marcus D V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
79 DOWD Peter L. D V V D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
80 MA YIXING (Tiger) D V V V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
80 LYCHKO Maksym V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
82 YANG Alex V D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
83 RVACHEV Michael V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
84 CUMMINGS Owen D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
85 BAI Brian V V D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 NG Nico V D D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
87 CAO Gavin D D V V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
88 KIM Remington D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
88 SIALA Omar D V D V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
90 RUSSELL James D D V D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
91 ZHAO Pierce D D V D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
92 BATISTA Julian V D D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
94 DU Yifan V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
95 HSU Joshua V D D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
96 SCHAUER Oliver D D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
97 FOGEL Jake V D D D V D D 0.9 2 +1.1
98 NILSEN Mark D D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
99 FRANCISCO Osvaldo D D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
100 GU Eric D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
101 CAFASSO Alexander D D D V V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
102 YAZDANFAR Marius D D D D V V D 0.7 2 +1.3
103 ZHANG Jonathan D D D V D V D 2.0 2 -
104 NALLICHERI Ayaan D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
105 LIU Adam D D V D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
106 SHETTY Mihir D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
107 ZENG Andrew D D D D V D D 4.0 1 -3.0
108 EVANS Joseph D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
109 ALAM Rajan D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
110 GAO Victor D D V D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
111 KAPLAN Maddox D D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
112 RATUSHNYI Georgii D D V D D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
113 RIM Dongwoo D D D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
113 ZHENG Jason D D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
115 SUN Lucas D D D D V D D 3.0 1 -2.0
116 LENNON Nicholas D V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
117 ZHAI Christopher V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
118 MATOS Adrian D D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
119 MALHAM Andrew D V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
120 LEE Anton D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
121 AU Joshua D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
122 KIM Zac D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
123 KLINKENBERG Patrick D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.