Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | PARK Sangwook | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
3 | ROBINSON Samuel | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
5 | JAIN Samyak | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
7 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
8 | WU Steven | D V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
9 | TANG Mingyuan | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
10 | DONG Haiyi | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
11 | LI Ethan R. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
12 | MIAO KUNQI | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | WU Johnny y. | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
14 | LEHNER Brian | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
16 | DENG haoyu | V V D V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
17 | AVETISIAN Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | ZHANG Austin | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
19 | CHEW Aedan | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
20 | SCHERZAY Ian | V D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
21 | YU Austin | V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
22 | XU Che | D V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
23 | SANKEY Levi | D V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
24 | MAXU Tiger | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
24 | CHU Theodore | V D D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
26 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | V V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
27 | LI Yunji (Rain) | V D V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | YOUNG Quentin | D V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | PARKE Nathaniel | V V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
30 | LOUIE Joseph | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
31 | DILLON Anik | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
32 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | V D D D D D | V V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
33 | KIM Alexander | V V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
34 | MCLAREN Mason | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
35 | SHIN Ryan | V V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
36 | SIM Ian | D V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
37 | WHITE Ryden | V D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
38 | SANKEY Luka | V V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | V V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
40 | CHARETTE Matthew | V V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
41 | GADHVI Darius | V V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
41 | DAVIDSON James | D V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
43 | CHENG Trevor | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
44 | WONG Preston | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
45 | LEE Royce | V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
46 | FEI Victor | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | GOROZA Eric | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
48 | FU Nolan | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
49 | CHANG Andrew | V D V D D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
50 | DENISON Declan | V V D V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
51 | KOFMAN David | V D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
52 | DENG Destin | V D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
53 | VOO Lucas | D D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | CHARETTE Alex | V D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
55 | LIANG Donny | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
56 | POSSON Luke | D D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
57 | KIM Ian | D D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
58 | LEE Damien | V D D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
59 | RUFANOV Maxim | V D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
60 | AVETISIAN Michael | V D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
61 | WANG Devin | D D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
62 | ZHANG Luqi | D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
63 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | D V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
64 | LIN Daniel | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
65 | KIM Remington | V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
66 | SU Samuel | D V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
67 | OR Anson | V D D D V V | D | 0.5 | 3 | +2.5 |
68 | SCHWITZER Eliot | V D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
69 | LEUNG Dylan | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
70 | SCHIPPER Johann | V V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
71 | QIAO James | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
72 | EMERSON Zachary | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
73 | WOO Lucas | D D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
74 | FUNG SHAUN | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
75 | LITTLE Alex | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
76 | SARMIENTO Luke | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
77 | WANG Lucas | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
78 | PARRA Lucas | D V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
79 | JONES Rodney | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
80 | WANG Dylan | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
81 | SUROV Alexander | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
82 | CHEONG Cameron | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
83 | GUO Luke | D V D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
84 | MARTIN zachary | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
85 | COLE Perrin | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
86 | RONG Marcus | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
87 | MENG Haoyi | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
88 | HAMILTON Travis | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
89 | NUGENT Curtis | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
90 | YU Nathan | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
91 | SMITH Mason | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
92 | MARTIN Lucas | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
93 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
94 | MILLER Xavier | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
95 | LI Sean | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
96 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
97 | DENG Andes | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
98 | QIAN Zhixu | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
99 | NIE Shuobo | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
100 | DOSHAY Noah | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.