Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 2 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 3 | SOLARZ Arthur | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 5 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 6 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 7 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
| 8 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 9 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | 9% |
| 10 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 12 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 14 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 15 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 17 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% | |
| 18 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 19 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 20 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GAO Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 22 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 23 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 24 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 25 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% |
| 26 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 30 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 31 | HE Bronto | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | AGUIRRE Pablo | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | WU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 37 | LEE Henry | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | GOVOROV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | KUSACTAY Eric | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 44 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 45 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 46 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 47 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 48 | LI Ray | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 49 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 50 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | MCGRATH Hogan | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | TUNG Charlie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 53 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 53 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 55 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 56 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 57 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 59 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 60 | AU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 61 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | YU David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 63 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 65 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 67 | WELCH Sebastian | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 69 | KIM Zac | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 70 | QI Bryan | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 71 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 73 | LIU George | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | LAU LUCAS | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 78 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 79 | SKLAR Davida | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | |
| 80 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 81 | HOOD Emery | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 82 | BARTON Christian | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | ATKINS Elan | 100% | 68% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | TOMPA Paul | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | MOSHIER Calvin | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | TANG Colin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 87 | JIANG Aidan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 89 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 91 | O'BRIEN Michael | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | JUSTA Rivan | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.