Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PARK Gi Beom | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | WANG Mendy | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | ZHONG Kingsley | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | WU Wallace | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 5 | VENAFRO Tristan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | RYU Dae Hyeon | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | QIAN Will | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | DENG Jonathan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 9 | HU Michael | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | GUGALA Frank | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 11 | XIAN Kevin | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 12 | CAO Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 13 | XIA Vincent | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 14 | YANG Luca | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 15 | KIAYIAS Anthony | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | ZUO Yizhi | V D D V D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 17 | ZHANG Eric | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 18 | HUANG Dalynn | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 19 | LU Ethan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 20 | CHEN Keegan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SHEN Lucas | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 22 | SONG Enoch | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 23 | LIN Lucas | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 24 | YOON Mason | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 25 | MOON Nolan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 26 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 27 | FANG Lionel | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 28 | WU David | V V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 30 | ZHAO David | V D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 31 | HAN Jiaren | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 32 | DING Jacob | D D D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 33 | BRADY David | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 34 | DAVE Neil | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 35 | MOORE Quinn | V V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 36 | XIE zhouhan | V V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 37 | CHEUNG Zachary | D V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 38 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | D V V V V | V | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 39 | LIU KUNDE | V D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 40 | DUAN EDWIN | V D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 41 | STARK Ethan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 42 | BHOSREKAR Som | D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 43 | WU Max | V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 44 | XU ETHAN | D D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 45 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | V V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 46 | HE Ryan | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 47 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | V D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 48 | BLAIS Julian | D D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 49 | ZHENG Vincent | V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 50 | CORCOS Joseph-Georges | D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 51 | WU Yulen | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 52 | JIANG Ethan | D V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 53 | CHAE Emmett | V V D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 54 | LEONG Michael | D V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 55 | LIN Alexander | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 56 | GENG Vincent | D D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 57 | SAVIR Ethan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 58 | PINTOLE Anthony | D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 59 | XIA Wenhao | D D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 60 | TYRIKOS FRAZIS Dimitri | D D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 61 | LEE Ryan | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 62 | LI Ethan | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 63 | PELLERIN Liam | D D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 64 | XIONG Jeffrey | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 65 | FOMIN Dashiell | V V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 66 | CAI Mark | V V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 67 | LEVKOVICH Milan | V D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 68 | CAI Charlie | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 69 | CHONG Cooper | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 70 | WANG Grant | D D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 71 | YANG Crescent | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 72 | MCLENDON Mateo | D D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 73 | TANAKA Nico | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 73 | LIU Max | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 75 | OBAS Logan X. | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 76 | RICHMAN Aaron | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 77 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 78 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 79 | MENZEL Lucas | D D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 80 | JAZWINSKI Archer | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 81 | MOSAMEH Faraj | D D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 82 | FAN Oscar | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 83 | CAI daniel | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 84 | HARDING James | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 85 | KIM JOSHUA | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 86 | ZEI Julian | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 87 | LIU KELVIN | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 88 | KIM ISAAC | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 89 | BANGALE Viraaj | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 90 | JUTAGIR Eugene | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 91 | CHEN Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 92 | KIM Marcus | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 93 | CHAN Theo | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 94 | KIM Rowan | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 94 | TANG QIXING (Bruce) | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.