Morris Cup RYC/RJCC

Y-12 Men's Foil

Sunday, November 23, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 PARK Gi Beom - - - 4% 44% 51%
2 WANG Mendy - - - - 4% 27% 69%
3 ZHONG Kingsley - 2% 14% 35% 37% 12%
3 WU Wallace - - - - - 10% 89%
5 VENAFRO Tristan - - 5% 23% 43% 29%
6 RYU Dae Hyeon - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 3%
7 QIAN Will - - 3% 17% 44% 35%
8 DENG Jonathan - 1% 7% 22% 37% 27% 7%
9 HU Michael - - - 4% 19% 42% 34%
10 GUGALA Frank - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
11 XIAN Kevin - - - - 1% 16% 83%
12 CAO Aaron - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
13 XIA Vincent - - 4% 19% 38% 32% 7%
14 YANG Luca - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
15 KIAYIAS Anthony - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
16 ZUO Yizhi 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
17 ZHANG Eric - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
18 HUANG Dalynn - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 32%
19 LU Ethan - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6%
20 CHEN Keegan - - 3% 14% 35% 36% 12%
21 SHEN Lucas - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 17%
22 SONG Enoch - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
23 LIN Lucas - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 29%
24 YOON Mason - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
25 MOON Nolan - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15% 1%
26 AMR HOSSNY Adam - 1% 9% 31% 43% 17%
27 FANG Lionel - 2% 17% 50% 28% 2%
28 WU David - 1% 7% 23% 40% 27% 2%
30 ZHAO David - - 4% 16% 34% 35% 11%
31 HAN Jiaren - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25% 2%
32 DING Jacob 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
33 BRADY David 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
34 DAVE Neil - 5% 25% 38% 25% 7% 1%
35 MOORE Quinn 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
36 XIE zhouhan 3% 18% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
37 CHEUNG Zachary 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
38 GOLDSTEIN Tate 16% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
39 LIU KUNDE 1% 9% 26% 36% 22% 5% -
40 DUAN EDWIN - 4% 16% 33% 31% 13% 2%
41 STARK Ethan - 3% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
42 BHOSREKAR Som 7% 34% 47% 12% 1% -
43 WU Max 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
44 XU ETHAN - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
45 GUTKOVSKIY Ryan 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
46 HE Ryan - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
47 STABROWSKI Joaquin - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
48 BLAIS Julian 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
49 ZHENG Vincent 1% 10% 28% 37% 20% 4%
50 CORCOS Joseph-Georges - - 2% 24% 50% 25%
51 WU Yulen 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3%
52 JIANG Ethan 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
53 CHAE Emmett - 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
54 LEONG Michael 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
55 LIN Alexander 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
56 GENG Vincent - 2% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1%
57 SAVIR Ethan 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
58 PINTOLE Anthony 2% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3%
59 XIA Wenhao 1% 5% 19% 33% 29% 11% 2%
60 TYRIKOS FRAZIS Dimitri 15% 53% 27% 5% - - -
61 LEE Ryan 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
62 LI Ethan 17% 40% 31% 10% 2% - -
63 PELLERIN Liam 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% 1% -
64 XIONG Jeffrey 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
65 FOMIN Dashiell 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
66 CAI Mark 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
67 LEVKOVICH Milan 8% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
68 CAI Charlie 23% 43% 26% 7% 1% -
69 CHONG Cooper 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
70 WANG Grant 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
71 YANG Crescent 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
72 MCLENDON Mateo - 5% 20% 35% 28% 9% 1%
73 TANAKA Nico 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
73 LIU Max 7% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
75 OBAS Logan X. 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 1% -
76 RICHMAN Aaron 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 1% -
77 AWALGAONKAR Aahan 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
78 POLEBOYINA Aarav 34% 48% 17% 1% - -
79 MENZEL Lucas - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7% -
80 JAZWINSKI Archer 31% 46% 19% 3% - -
81 MOSAMEH Faraj 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
82 FAN Oscar 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
83 CAI daniel 26% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -
84 HARDING James 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
85 KIM JOSHUA 10% 36% 36% 15% 3% - -
86 ZEI Julian 67% 30% 3% - - - -
87 LIU KELVIN 30% 49% 19% 2% - -
88 KIM ISAAC 22% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
89 BANGALE Viraaj 42% 41% 15% 3% - - -
90 JUTAGIR Eugene < 1% 5% 27% 41% 23% 5% -
91 CHEN Aidan 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
92 KIM Marcus 11% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
93 CHAN Theo 40% 42% 16% 3% - - -
94 KIM Rowan 16% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
94 TANG QIXING (Bruce) 1% 21% 45% 28% 5% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.