Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 2 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 3 | LIN Kyran | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 6 | NOEL Sebastien A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 7 | KOOHPAREH Kian | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | JIN Daniel | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 9 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 10 | HIGGINS Branford | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | COPEN Samuel S. | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 12 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
| 13 | XU Alex | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | KOPPE Alexander | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 16 | GAO Chaney C. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 18 | WANG Devon | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | DAO Alexander | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | KIM Jayden | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | MCDONALD Ethan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | THOMAS Michael | 3% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FERRIERE Joshua | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% | |
| 24 | SHA Michael | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 25 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | WANG owen | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | PHUKAN Rohin | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | CHUNG Michael | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | GREGSTON Layland | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 35% | 45% | 11% | |
| 31 | COPEN Elliot P. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | LO Jake | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 34 | RAINEY Daniel | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | KIM Sullivan | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | PARK Brendan | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.