Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
2 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
3 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
3 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
6 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
7 | KOOHPAREH Kian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
8 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
9 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
10 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
11 | COPEN Samuel S. | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
12 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
13 | XU Alex | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
14 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | |
15 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
16 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
17 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
18 | WANG Devon | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
19 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
21 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 97% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% | 4% | |
24 | SHA Michael | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
25 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
26 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
27 | WANG owen | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
28 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
29 | CHUNG Michael | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
30 | GREGSTON Layland | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 11% | |
31 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | LO Jake | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
33 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
34 | RAINEY Daniel | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
37 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | PARK Brendan | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.